Search for: "SMITH v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA"
Results 141 - 160
of 315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2020, 5:55 pm
Smith, 574 F.2d 988 (9th Cir. 1978)(sodomy). [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:32 am
Florida Bar (2015). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(Class 46) Poland Reputation's rating (Class 46) Polish patent attorneys’ professionalism (Class 46) South Africa Orange miniskirt debacle less filling (Patent Baristas) (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours ‘per se’ (Class 46) Tunisia Tunisia lines up for copyright training (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: KCI negative pressure patent valid and infringed: KCI Licensing Inc and others v… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
If so … (Class 46) Poland Reputation’s rating (Class 46) Polish patent attorneys’ professionalism (Class 46) South Africa Orange miniskirt debacle less filling (Patent Baristas) (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours ‘per se’ (Class 46) Tunisia Tunisia lines up for copyright training (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: KCI negative pressure patent valid and infringed: KCI Licensing Inc and others v… [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:26 pm
SMITH and DIEBOLD INCORPORATED, Petitioners, v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:19 am
Attorney General John Ashcroft and a cadre of top Bush-era U.S. attorneys is forming a new law firm, an outgrowth of his consulting business. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:01 am
And the possibility of such shenanigans bears on the Hassell v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Fairbanks Scales Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court W D North Carolina: When an assignor is not stopped: Borgwarmer v Honeywell (Property, intangible) Bull in Bilski’s china shop: B of A’s financial instrument: Ex Parte Birle (12:01 Tuesday) District Court S D Florida: Court labels claims transformed in patent reexamination mere disguise: Aspex Eyewear v Marchon Eyewear (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court S D California: ‘Unreasonable,’… [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
Before the case could go to trial, the Virginia general assembly repealed the statute. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Injunction against, inter alia, installing time bomb on computers , RELIABLE v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 10:29 am
Higgins, 788 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Smith v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 2:44 pm
SS&C Technology Holdings v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:08 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:16 am
Once the Attorney General approves and promulgates the national standards, corrections systems that cannot certify their compliance will lose a percentage of their prison-related federal funding. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 3:00 am
The last option—disclosure followed by a court ruling—is consistent with Korf, a decision binding on the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 4:44 pm
Eisenstein v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm
Carello v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:15 am
In Axcan Scandipharm v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General… [read post]
