Search for: "SMITH v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA" Results 141 - 160 of 317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2016, 6:19 am by John Elwood
First up is White v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm by Michael Froomkin
Law) the ethics counsel for the Broward County Inspector General’s Office [yes, not an oxymoron], a former trial attorney and Miami-Dade assistant state attorney and Oscar Rodriguez-Fonts (J.D. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
Clark 16-32Issue: Whether the Federal Arbitration Act pre-empts a state-law contract rule that singles out arbitration by requiring a power of attorney to expressly refer to arbitration agreements before the attorney-in-fact can bind her principal to an arbitration agreement. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 1:26 pm by Alexandra Gutierrez
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in Lane v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am by Eugene Volokh
The Attorney General thus errs in stating that “there is no First Amendment right to use the copyrighted work of another, Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
Florida, 15-6075, and Smith v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:18 pm by D. Daxton White
I am not a licensed investment professional but rather a securities attorney that handles litigation cases against brokerage firms. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Children's National Medical Center, 121 A.3d 59, 66 (D.C. 2015) (adopting Restatement §500 “high degree of risk of harm” standard).Florida:  Dyals v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:39 pm by David M. Goldman
  The Florida Supreme Court gave 3 reasons for this rule in Barnett Nat’l Bank of Jacksonville v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:39 pm by David M. Goldman
  The Florida Supreme Court gave 3 reasons for this rule in Barnett Nat’l Bank of Jacksonville v. [read post]