Search for: "SMITH v. CLARK" Results 141 - 160 of 443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2013, 3:30 am by John L. Welch
Clark, Opposition No. 91182168 [Section 2(d) opposition to PACIFIC PILLOWS for "on-line retail store services featuring bedding" in view of the mark PACIFIC COAST registered for pillows and previously used for other bedding items and related retail store services].April 11, 2013 - 11 AM: Wolverine Outdoors, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
’ Graham Smith, writing on his Cyberleagle blog, provides a detailed run-down of the implications for internet publication. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am by Emma Lewis, Olswang LLP
They gave three reasons for their conclusion: No misuse of power Eclairs and Glengary sought to rely on the case of Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd [1974] AC 821 where it was held that the board had used their power for an improper purpose. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Doctor Rachel Clarke reported the tweet to the police and has threatened to sue Moran for defamation. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Thornhill, Clear As Mud: Pleasant Grove City V. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd & Anor v Smith, heard 20-21 Feb 2018. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:19 am by Unknown
SEC, December 19, 2023, Smith, J.).Default rule is vacatur. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 5:18 am by Victoria Clark
  Victoria Clark, Matthew Kahn, Mikhaila Fogel, Quinta Jurecic, and Benjamin Wittes offered their analysis of the latest twist in a L'Affaire Russe subplot: Peter Smith and the case of the 33,000 missing emails. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 3:59 pm by Emily Dai
Clarke considered the long-term future of Afghanistan. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am by Neil Wilkof
The three-part test for breach of confidence set out in the English case of "Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd" [1969] RPC 41 is well known to common-law practitioners. [read post]