Search for: "SMITH v. STATE OF MAINE" Results 141 - 160 of 716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2014, 5:06 pm
 Judge Kozinski has a couple of main points, but his most persuasive one (in my view) is the central claim that it's not the individual doctor's fault that Peralta's rights were violated, but instead the state's fault for not providing enough money for enough dentists. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 1:23 pm by Stewart Baker
 Michael suggests a new feature to keep all the litigation straight:  This Week in Smith v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
 Michael suggests a new feature to keep all the litigation straight:  This Week in Smith v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 10:36 am
  The first three pages of the agreement contained the main obligations between the LLC and the other party to the agreement. [read post]
  Marcus Smith J’s main judgment was handed down on 4 December 2020 and a detailed look at it can be found here. [read post]
12 May 2019, 5:06 am by INFORRM
” This exclusion is nowhere stated in the White Paper. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 1:42 pm by Ilya Somin
The fate of Smith is the main reason why this case has caught the eye of legal commentators understandably so. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:46 am by Daniel Richardson
By Daniel RichardsonEstate of Nancy Alden v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 4:05 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]