Search for: "STATE v BUCK" Results 141 - 160 of 1,173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2021, 11:40 am by Joe Mullin
  These individuals and companies are all inventive, but they’re not relying on patent threats to make a buck. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am by INFORRM
Councillor Buck Buchanan has been sanctioned following a social media post being critical of Mayoral Candidate Glen Carritt. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 11:40 pm by Léon Dijkman
Even in the US, where courts have exercised discretion over patent injunctions since the Supreme Court's 2006 decision in eBay v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
Epic released a software update for Apple iOS devices on 13 August 2020 making the Fortnite’s virtual currency (called V-Bucks) available for purchase through its own website, in addition to Apple’s App Store, at a 20 per cent discount. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Sophie Corke
See coverage on FOSS Patents, JUVE Patent, Legal Patent, and the Kluwer Patent Blog - and, of course, the IPKat - for more.Over on Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter commented on the UK Supreme Court's recent "well-reasoned" decision in Secretary of State for Health v. [read post]
Babies and children lack legal capacity—and rely on the care of parents, guardians, or the state to survive. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
“Lawyer and writer Kate Morgan chronicles the legal history of murder, and explores the roles killers, victims, lawyers and judges have played in making UK murder law what it is today” on the BBC’s History Extra podcast.Paul Lombardo, Georgia State Law, the author of the Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:54 pm by John Elwood
§ 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court in violation of Woodford v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court in violation of Woodford v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:50 am by Derek T. Muller
Nelson, Bade, Collins, and Lee) (joined by two senior judges, O'Scannlain and Trott), and Justice Neil Gorsuch repeatedly mentioned in his opinion that the Ninth Circuit’s decision was rendered over the dissenting views of at least 12 members of that court.The second is United States v. [read post]