Search for: "STATE v DAY" Results 141 - 160 of 60,157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The merger was negotiated while the entire sports betting industry held its breath; the Supreme Court was considering Murphy v National Collegiate Athletic Assn, 584 U.S. 453 (2018) the case that allowed states to legalize sports gambling. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, Justice Sotomayor’s opinion for the Court last year in Dubin v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, the High Court awarded summary judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of BW Legal Services v Trust Pilot A/S [2024] EWHC 1449 (KB). [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:02 am by Eleonora Rosati
In this sense, decisions like those of the US Copyright Office in Zarya of the Dawn [IPKat here] and the Beijing Internet Court in Li v Liu [IPKat here] are helpful. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 12:23 am by Frank Cranmer
  No right to assisted dying under the ECHR In the case of Dániel Karsai v Hungary [2024] ECHR No. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 10:14 am by John Floyd
  Hamilton was correct, but the constitutional scholar could not have foreseen, in his wildest imagination, the Court’s decision-making in Bush v. [read post]