Search for: "STATE v POUND"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:26 am
In particular, Hacon HHJ stated: “I do not take the view that it is incumbent upon an SME to prove exhaustively that it cannot access loans from elsewhere to fund litigation” (at [14]). [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Reece v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
As stated in North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 he ‘is not an insurer against all hazards’. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:07 am
Christopher Niebel v Information Commissioner – 14 October 2013 We have just succeeded in an appeal to the Information Rights Tribunal against a fine of £300,000 issued by the Information Commissioner against one of our clients for a breach of the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR). [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:38 am
Nothing on today’s order list about this 800-pound-gorilla of election cases. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Morris v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:00 pm
In the recent case of Batts v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:34 am
He borrowed £6,500 (£7,450 when the fee was included). [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:34 am
He borrowed £6,500 (£7,450 when the fee was included). [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
” Under the principle in Lumba (Congo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 it was held that permitting her judicial review claim to proceed would result in a £1 award for damages because she had already been released from detention when it was issued “and it could bring her no practical benefit. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:27 am
£875,000 was therefore released for the purchase of 2 Great Oak Court. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 9:54 am
Wolens v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 9:54 am
Wolens v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
He attached real importance to the form of the letter, stating that it made no judicial application (i.e. to adjourn the hearing or set aside the service) and did not carry a statement of truth. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:06 pm
As is well known, the House of Lords in Stack v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:40 am
In 2008 a purchaser agreed to buy Rush Green Hall for £1.9m and £190,000 was received as a deposit. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:31 am
This week's employment law Case of the Week is Smith v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
