Search for: "STATE v. FIGUEROA"
Results 141 - 160
of 219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2019, 1:32 pm
A recent case from New York, Figueroa v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 2:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 8:52 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 3:19 pm
ADA pleading Figueroa v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:15 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
Figueroa-Florez, 64 F.4th 223 (2d Cir. 2022); United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:56 pm
Figueroa, 40 Misc 3d 1010, 1018, 968 N.Y.S.2d 866, 872-73 (Rye City Ct 2013) (three seconds); People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:39 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 11:05 am
The only option that couples had to obtain a divorce was to petition it the "old fashioned way", and only if they qualified under one of the causes stated in the PR Civil Code (Cruel Treatment, Abandon, Separation, Adultery, etc.), then could their divorce be granted by the Court.Then, Figueroa Ferrer v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 1:16 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
'Flores-Figueroa' Requires Vacatur of Alien's §1028A Aggravated Identity Theft Conviction
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:03 am
United States in my pocket. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 5:56 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Florida v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 1:21 am
In accord with the vigorous opposition to the settlement, the Southern District of Florida determined that the proposed coupon settlement could not withstand the heightened scrutiny demanded by the Class Action Fairness Act.In Figueroa v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
McFadden of the Northampton County Court of Common Pleas in the case of Figueroa v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 8:16 am
District Judge Stephen V. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:11 am
In Figueroa, Iacobucci J., speaking for himself and five other judges, states, “the best interpretation of s. 3 is one that advances the values and principles that embody a free and democratic state, including respect for a diversity of beliefs and opinions” (Figueroa, Iacobucci J., para. 27). [read post]
