Search for: "STATE v. MCKENNA"
Results 141 - 160
of 384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2018, 7:26 am
McKenna, in which it, along with the now-defunct Backpage.com, successfully sued to enjoin the enforcement of a Washington State Law on grounds that it conflicted with both Section 230 and the First Amendment.) [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 2:07 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:47 am
The stay application (Family PAC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:54 am
Rob McKenna et al. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 4:23 pm
., who spent the first three pages of his opinion in McKenna v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:06 pm
Washington State Attorney General Rob McKenna has been granted argument time to present the position of the States. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:14 am
McKenna emphasized the importance of applying the Rogers v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:57 am
* Mark McKenna, Probabilistic Knowledge of Third-Party Trademark Infringement, Stanford Technology Law Review (2011). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm
Mark McKenna has a paper on trademark's trajectory from state to federal-plus-state law, quoted below. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
” (Elonis v United States, 16). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:55 pm
Concepcion - Hartford, CT lawyer Wystan Ackerman of Robinson & Cole on the firm's Insurance Class Actions Insider WWJD--United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:04 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:09 pm
Earlier today, the Hawaii Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kaleikini v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Second, Sanambar v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Third, R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:11 pm
When the issue is whether a seller can participate in the secondary market for the trademarked goods, we may need what Mark McKenna calls channeling doctrines (Dastar, for example) to prevent trademark owners from getting more than what trademark gives them. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd,… [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 8:07 am
The Rogers v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard 2-3 November 2020 R (on the application of TN (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor, heard 30… [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:50 am
R (Johnson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
