Search for: "STATE v. TRACEY"
Results 141 - 160
of 166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2009, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 10:24 am
Now, the Columbia Circuit Court must rule on the motion to suppress the evidence obtained from the illegal search.--------- Attorney Tracey A. [read post]
12 May 2009, 3:40 am
Argued October 7, 2008—Decided April 21, 2009--------- Attorney Tracey A. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:11 am
The conviction was reversed.Wisconsin -v- ClientCrossing Fog Lane LinesWisconsin Drunk Driving Laws--------- Attorney Tracey A. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:29 am
I just finished reading an intriguing essay by Tracey George and Chris Guthrie (forthcoming in Duke Law Journal) arguing for a change to the structure of the Supreme Court, primarily by expanding the size of the Court (to 15 justices) and having most cases argued and decided in panels of three (with an en banc process for important cases, including those in which a state or federal law is challenged on constitutional grounds). [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 9:03 am
On April 17, 2009, the Appellate Division decided Tracey Wilde v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 5:37 pm
Tracey L. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:03 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Larry Craig v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
§ 524(a) makes a state-court judgment void ab initio when entered against a debtor whose dischargeable debts had been discharged, or whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine compels federal courts to respect the state-court judgment. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 11:05 am
" State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:14 am
The Supreme Court of Canada weighed in on the issue this year in Strother v. 3464920 Canada Inc. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 9:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:59 am
State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:27 am
Tracey Lamont Martin, a 7-page opinion, Judge Crone writes:The State of Indiana appeals from the trial court's directed verdict in favor of Tracey Lamont Martin, who was charged with domestic battery as a class D felony. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 2:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 8:17 am
In particular, this part highlights the spoken and unspoken premises that influenced the result in Bustamonte and outlines Bustamonte's continuing relevance for consent search cases today.Part III examines United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
Cox, alluding to the AFSCME v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 6:21 am
That case is United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
AFSCME and several state pension funds, including the nation's largest, the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), sent letters to the SEC in mid-November urging Cox to let the AFSCME v. [read post]