Search for: "STONE v. HOLDER"
Results 141 - 160
of 182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2009, 7:22 pm
See Greenberg v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:33 am
The indictment goes after six individuals, who between them owned 14 Mercedes-Benz automobiles with license plates such as "POLICE," "MAFIA," "V," "STONED," "CEO," "HACKER, " GOOD," "EVIL," and—perhaps presciently—"GUILTY. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:50 am
French '3 strikes' law now legal (Ars Technica) (IP Watch) Germany Denic softens its registration rules (IPKat) Sweden Pirate Bay founders banned from running the site (TorrentFreak) Fresh Pirate Bay purchase attempt by four potential buyers (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom ISP threatens legal action against UK over anti-piracy plans (TorrentFreak) UK to introduce three strikes policy (Michael Geist) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) United States US General Facebook for scientists gets… [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:17 pm
So here's an excerpt about a kooky little copyright case called Strachborneo v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
French ‘3 strikes’ law now legal (Ars Technica) (IP Watch) Germany Denic softens its registration rules (IPKat) Sweden Pirate Bay founders banned from running the site (TorrentFreak) Fresh Pirate Bay purchase attempt by four potential buyers (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom ISP threatens legal action against UK over anti-piracy plans (TorrentFreak) UK to introduce three strikes policy (Michael Geist) (Electronic Frontier Foundation)… [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:50 am
French '3 strikes' law now legal (Ars Technica) (IP Watch) Germany Denic softens its registration rules (IPKat) Sweden Pirate Bay founders banned from running the site (TorrentFreak) Fresh Pirate Bay purchase attempt by four potential buyers (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom ISP threatens legal action against UK over anti-piracy plans (TorrentFreak) UK to introduce three strikes policy (Michael Geist) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) United States US General Facebook for scientists gets… [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 2:09 pm
That is obviously true of abortion rights under Roe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:49 am
With respect to the arbitrary and unrealistic time deadlines, the authors look for support in DeLaune v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
These “rates” are not set in stone, have no necessary public policy benefits, and can be changed at the discretion of prosecutors across the country.[7] ID: Informing Defendants In Padilla v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm
Spotify AB v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Professor Eugene Volokh has thoroughly explored the implications of leading cases on the subject like Holder v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
Stephen M. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm
Spotify AB v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:04 am
Eventually, in Stone v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:41 am
Stones Left Unturned—What is “Electronic Communication”? [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
If so, what must the copyright holder show? [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:17 am
To be sure, it’s never been set in stone, and not all feds have played ball. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm
My response to that is to quote Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
