Search for: "STRANGE v. STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 2,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Many years ago, I got into a strange sort of contretemps with Judge Harry Edwards of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 11:17 am
The Supreme Court's ruling this past summer in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Mark W Podvia, emeritus from Dickinson School of Law of the Pennsylvania State University, has published The Strange Case of Dr. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 5:42 pm by Ronald Mann
Buckley also emphasizes a Supreme Court decision from 1885 (not a typo), Strang v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Scott R. Anderson
  Historical Practice and AUMF Interpretation The idea that subsequent practice should bear on how one interprets a statute is, in many ways, a strange one. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 1:07 pm
Which Nevada apparently allows.That just strikes me as strange. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
In a similar vein, we are thankful for the helpful briefing and argument we received from the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:18 am by Florian Mueller
First, legislative measures like the DMA, regulatory intervention such as the ongoing DG COMP investigation of the Google Play Store, and litigation (in less than a week, the Ninth Circuit will hear Epic v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am by Frank Cranmer
And finally…I The strange case of the archpriest who plotted to poison the personal secretary of the Georgian Orthodox Patriarch while in Berlin: Mamaladze v Georgia [2022] ECHR 922. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
”More than fifty years ago, in Miranda v Arizona, the US Supreme Court warned about the dangers inherent in private settings and circumstances which allow state officials to subjugate and intimidate people. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:17 am by Michael C. Dorf
TarrowWhen, on June 24th, the Supreme Court effectively liquidated Roe v Wade, scholars of social movements and abortion rights shook their heads – but not in disbelief. [read post]