Search for: "STUART v. STUART"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2021, 12:15 pm
Google appealed that decision to the Supreme Court in January 2019, and three attorneys made arguments to the High Court in October 2020: Thomas Goldstein of Goldstein & Russell argued for Google; Joshua Rosenkranz of Orrick argued for Oracle; and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stuart argued on behalf of the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Claire referred to the HGS v Lilly [2011] UKSC 51 and Actavis v Lilly [2015] EWHC 3294 (Pat) cases as examples of patents which did not have data in them and yet were found to be plausible. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 3:09 pm
My friend Mitu Gulati has co-written a timely essay with his colleague Stuart Benjamin entitled "Mr. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:45 am
Our colleague Stuart M. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:45 am
Our colleague Stuart M. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:05 am
Cheshire V-at the Duke professors, journalists, and others who had so eagerly joined Nifong's mob. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:31 am
Biskupic replies: "He wrote to me, Stuart. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:32 am
By: Stuart M. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:15 am
A helpful example in this regard is the case of Joseph Arthur Walter Brown v The NDPP and Others in which the former chief executive of Fidentia, who had been charged with numerous counts of fraud and theft, applied for a permanent stay of the prosecution against him on the basis that pre-trial media coverage infringed his right to a fair trial. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 8:45 am
Attorney Stuart Gerson discusses two main cases from the term with labor and employment implications, Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 1:41 pm
Stuart Mgt., the U.S. [read post]
19 May 2007, 9:18 pm
The whole deal in the CAFC opinion in KSR v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 am
The following guest post comes from Stuart Meyer, a Partner with Fenwick & West. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
Filed: May 25, 2011Opinion by: Judge Stuart R. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 5:36 am
Stuart, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
The book looks at such pivotal cases as the 1922 Supreme Court case which held that federal antitrust laws did not apply to baseball; the 1972 Flood v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 9:05 pm
” [Dave Hoffman] Walden v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 12:31 pm
We will explain the new Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 12:10 pm
" Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:49 am
Law Lessons from STUART LANTZ VS. [read post]
