Search for: "Safir v Safir"
Results 141 - 160
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 11:58 pm
Dismissed probationer has the burden of showing the termination was for an unlawful or other improper conductJohnson v New York City Dept. of Education, 2010 NY Slip Op 04195, decided on May 11, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentCiting Matter of Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, the Appellate Division said “A probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing* and without a statement of reasons in the absence of a demonstration that the termination was in… [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:42 am
Matter of CSEA v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:00 pm
Martinez v Safir, App. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:25 am
Refusal to answer questions after being given “use immunity”Martinez v Safir, App. [read post]
5 May 2010, 2:18 am
False statements made in an investigationAbbate v Safir, 279 A.D.2d 260Not being truthful in responding to questions posed in the course of an official investigation may result in disciplinary action.New York City police officer Anthony Abbate was found guilty of charges that he "lied at his official interview" when he denied that he had "uttered profanities to another officer," and, in a separate incident, "was discourteous and disrespectful to another… [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:26 am
Under the circumstances, said the court, "[t]he penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness, citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, in support of its ruling. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:27 am
Disciplinary hearings held in absentiaMari v Safir, App. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm
"Citing Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, the court said it had to apply a "stringent standard of review" in considering termination cases of probationary employees. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:06 am
Supreme Court dismissed Shabazz’s petition; the Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s ruling.Citing Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, the Appellate Division said that a probationary employee may only challenge his or her termination if he or she demonstrates that he or she was dismissed in bad faith or for an improper reason. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:19 pm
A police force is a quasi-military organization and its members are subject strict disciplineMatter of Lundy v City of Oswego, 59 AD3d 954George Lundy sued the City of Oswego and its mayor in an effort to annul a Civil Service Law Section 75 determination terminating his employment as Oswego’s Chief of Police.The Appellate Division found that the disciplinary determination was supported by the requisite substantial evidence, i.e., "such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may… [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 8:49 am
Penzer v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:54 am
Disciplinary settlementsAlfred v Safir, App. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
"In Martinez v Safir, App. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:34 am
Supreme Court dismissed Shabazz's petition; the Appellate Division affirmed the lower court's ruling.Citing Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, the Appellate Division said that a probationary employee may only challenge his or her termination if he or she demonstrates that he or she was dismissed in bad faith or for an improper reason. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
" Martinez v Safir, App. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 4:11 am
A police force is a quasi-military organization and its members are subject strict disciplineMatter of Lundy v City of Oswego, 2009 NY Slip Op 00772, Decided on February 6, 2009, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentGeorge Lundy sued the City of Oswego and its mayor in an effort to annul a Civil Service Law Section 75 determination terminating his employment as Oswego's Chief of Police.The Appellate Division found that the disciplinary determination was supported by the requisite… [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:02 pm
"Citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, the court said that the penalty imposed - a 40-day suspension -did not its judicial conscience and, further, was consistent with the City's Administrative Code § 14-115(a).The Appellate Division also noted that police discipline in New York City is subject to the Administrative Code of the City of New York and that the procedures set forth in Civil Service Law §75 are inapplicable in such cases.The full text of… [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
He also admitted to using cocaine on several occasions while employed as a Firefighter by the Department in the course of the disciplinary hearing.Citing Murolo v Safir, 246 AD2d 653, the Appellate Division found that the determination that Kelly knowingly ingested cocaine "while employed by the Fire Department of the City of New York is supported by substantial evidence and therefore may not be set aside. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 12:10 pm
Misuse of an agency's computersBedford v Raymond W. [read post]
