Search for: "Sales v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 8,879
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
In an Opinion on August 14, 2013 (Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:42 am
Toys "R" Us, Inc., has interpreted the first sale doctrine to cover both (1) copies manufactured aboard but first sold in the United States and (2) copies manufactured abroad but first sold in the United States with the American copyright owner's permission. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:48 am by Mark Nieds
This changed on June 21, 2018 when the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:48 am by Mark Nieds
This changed on June 21, 2018 when the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:23 pm by The Federalist Society
  The question before the Supreme Court is twofold: (1) whether common law principles of agency apply in determining whether an entity is an “agent” of a foreign state under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA); and (2) whether, under the first clause of the commercial activity exception of the FSIA, a tort claim for personal injuries suffered in connection with travel outside of the United States is “based upon” the allegedly… [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 10:56 am by Stacia Lay
  The Second Circuit concluded that the first sale defense in Section 109(a) of the Copyright Act applies only to copies of copyrighted works manufactured in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:34 am by Charles Sartain
United States was whether certain mineral related transactions between Exxon and the countries of Qatar and Malaysia were sales or leases. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:50 pm by WIMS
AWR seeks to enjoin a timber salvage sale proposed by the United States Forest Service. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:31 pm by The Federalist Society
In an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court held that (1) Lexmark exhausted its patent rights in toner cartridges sold in the United States through its "Return Program"; and (2) Lexmark cannot sue Impression Products for patent infringement with respect to cartridges Lexmark sold abroad, which Impression Products acquired from purchasers and imported into the United States, because an authorized sale outside the United… [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am by Andrew Lustigman
The recent Supreme Court term resulted in a number of very important decisions that will impact companies engaging in advertising and marketing in the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 11:14 am by Charles Bieneman
  Second, the first sale doctrine “applies only to copies that were lawfully made or sold in the United States, not to foreign-made copies not authorized for sale within the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:22 am
[6/9/09 PM Update:  The United States Supreme Court just cleared the Chrysler sale! [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:12 am by Jim Singer
Int’l Trade Comm’n), the Federal Circuit ruled that a sale of a patented article outside the United States does not authorize the buyer to import the article back into the United States or sell the article within the United States. [read post]