Search for: "Samuel Bray"
Results 141 - 160
of 251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2022, 6:47 pm
My eponymous co-blogger Eugene Volokh has called attention to a case that involves the question whether a bumble bee is a "fish" for purposes of a California statute. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 4:54 am
"Legal history regarded as a whole is a history of institutions as well as of doctrines, and it cannot be complete until the influence of each of these two factors in producing the common product is shown in its due proportion. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:48 am
Today the Harvard Law Review has published its issue on the Supreme Court's October 2022 Term, and Will Baude and I have a case comment on Biden v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:44 am
From David Daube, the renowned scholar of biblical and Roman law, who was a professor at Oxford and Berkeley among other places: "As regards interpretation, the author of the Rhetoric to Alexander distinguishes between laws which are clear and laws which are ambiguous. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
The next edition of Ames, Chafee, and Re on Remedies is off to the publisher (Foundation) for next fall, and I'm going to write a series of posts about the revision. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm
In my previous post I highlighted three weaknesses in the new historians' brief about national injunctions. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 11:21 am
A major new brief in the Seventh Circuit sanctuary city caseA major new brief on national injunctions was filed two days ago in the Seventh Circuit sanctuary city case. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 7:19 pm
Have you ever heard a legal scholar criticize a doctrine because it does several different things, but it isn't really good at any one of those things? [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:31 pm
A commonplace book entry: George J. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 9:32 am
Yesterday's argument in Garland v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:15 am
Sometimes the question is asked whether the Administrative Procedure Act authorizes courts to give national injunctions, because it says that a "reviewing court shall . . . hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be . . . arbitrary . . . [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:38 am
Sometimes it seems like nothing ever changes with the national injunction. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm
The national injunction is moving from a simmer to a boil. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 3:27 am
This is the fifth and last in in a series of posts summarizing an article titled Remand Without Vacatur and the Ab Initio Invalidity of Unlawful Regulations in Administrative Law, which is forthcoming in the BYU Law Review. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 6:56 am
Three notes on national injunctions. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
My new UCLA colleague Samuel Bray was involved with the center until he came to us — not as an Academic Fellow as such, but in a related way — and my sense is that his participation with it helped him tremendously. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 9:43 am
” Samuel Bray, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, asked the paper. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 11:00 am
Bray, John N. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 5:43 pm
Distinguished commentators for 2025 include: } Charles Barzun (Virginia) } Seth Davis (UC-Berkeley) } Seana Shiffrin (UCLA) } Samuel Bray (Notre Dame) } Saikrishna Prakash (Virginia) } Amanda Tyler (UC-Berkeley) All constitutional law scholars are invited to attend. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 7:33 am
(Jesse Wegman, The New York Times) Standing Doctrine and the Supreme Court (Samuel Bray, The Volokh Conspiracy) The post The morning read for Wednesday, November 15 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
