Search for: "Sanders v. Department of Justice"
Results 141 - 160
of 172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2009, 8:35 am
McGhee and Wood v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The Department Of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) administers the J-51 program in the City of New York. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:51 pm
Sanders (07-1209), the Court rejected, by a vote of six to three, the Federal Circuit’s “harmless-error” framework for the review of claims decisions by the Department of Veterans Affairs. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 10:13 am
Sanders, 128 S. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 2:22 pm
Sanders, 128 S. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: New Zealand Prime Minister announces s 92A ‘three strikes’ copyright provision will be scrapped (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) US: TomTom files countersuit against Microsoft claiming its Streets… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:02 am
Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. greeted her as she reached the lectern, telling her, "We wish you well. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Sanders (07-1209), involving who bears the burden of showing the failure of the Department of Veterans Affairs to give statutorily required notice to benefits claimants was or was not prejudicial. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Sanders (07-1209), involving who bears the burden of showing the failure of the Department of Veterans Affairs to give statutorily required notice to benefits claimants was or was not prejudicial. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 7:40 pm
That case is Ronald Sanders, et al. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
The Justice Department, which filed its motion for stay last Friday, must file its reply by Thursday. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:11 pm
The Court of Appeals' Sept.. 2nd opinion in the case of In Ronald Sanders, Paul Hardin, Dallas Kelp, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:29 pm
Sanders Issue: Whether courts must presume the failure of the Department of Veterans' Affairs to give notice to benefits' claimants to be prejudicial. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
Sanders, 07-1209). [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 1:44 pm
Sanders (07-1209) where the Federal Circuit found the failure of the Department of Veterans' Affairs to give notice to benefits' claimants must be presumed to be prejudicial (filings available here). [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 1:43 pm
This provision was originally inserted to counterbalance a recalcitrant Justice Department that was unwilling to go after fraud. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 2:21 pm
Oregon Department of Agriculture (07-474), with Chief Justice John G. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
Sanders Issue: Whether courts must presume the failure of the Department of Veterans' Affairs to give notice to benefits' claimants to be prejudicial. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, March 19, 2008 Snyder v. [read post]
