Search for: "Santana, Appeal of"
Results 141 - 160
of 189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
A North Carolina appeals court reversed the suppression, holding that any prolonged detention that happened after the citation was “de minimis. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Santana applies where police officers seek to arrest a fleeing suspect for a misdemeanor; and (2) whether a police officer is entitled to qualified immunity where he pursued a suspect fleeing the officer’s attempt to arrest him for a jailable misdemeanor committed in the officer’s presence, into the front yard of a residence through a gate used to access the front door, and the officer had reason to believe the suspect might have been just involved in a fight involving… [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Trevino held that procedural default rules do not apply if a state’s procedural framework makes it highly unlikely that a defendant will have a meaningful chance to raise an ineffective-assistance claim on direct appeal. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
§ 7410’s express limit on the EPA’s disapproval authority and decisions of other courts of appeals, the EPA may substitute its own policy preferences for a state’s about the appropriate means of controlling air pollution within that state, without identifying any applicable “requirement of th[e] [Clean Air Act]” with which the state’s chosen means would interfere; and (2) whether the panel erred under SEC v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) is authorized to certify “accredited representatives” employed by any “non-profit religious, charitable, social service, or similar organization established in the United States” so long as the organization “makes only nominal charges and assesses no excessive membership dues for persons given assistance” and “has at its disposal adequate knowledge, information and experience. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 2:09 pm
My customers would not want a Santana either. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
Santana in 2006, essential allegations are generally determined by the statute defining the crime. [read post]
2 May 2013, 3:40 pm
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/currentsct.htmlPetition for certiorari was filed in Santana v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:49 am
Respondent appealed the Velletri Court's order and, on April 5, 2013, the Court of Appeals in Rome vacated several provisions of the September 20, 2012, Order and granted Respondent exclusive custody of the children. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
On appeal, the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s determination that there was a grave risk of harm to the children because repatriation to the country of habitual residence created a real risk of triggering further psychological trauma, regardless of any potential mitigating arrangements. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
Santana supra at 212-213; See, Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:07 pm
Flores-Lopez appealed, arguing that the evidence was tainted by an unlawful, warrantless search. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 10:03 pm
Santana, JUN76, USSC No. 75-19. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
The Fourth District Court of Appeal ruled yesterday in Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:21 pm
The Fourth District Court of Appeal upheld the verdict in 2009. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
The “West Memphis Three” have long been a cause célèbre, for good reason: the case had all the hallmarks of a railroad prosecution, from hysteria over Satanism to a coerced confession by a minor with a well below average I.Q. to the lack of any forensic evidence or eyewitness testimony connecting Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelley to the brutal murder of three young boys in 1993. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:40 am
Download Santana. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:44 am
Santana… More post-release control follies: in State v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
Ex Parte Roque César Nido Lanausse (Puerto Rico Court of Appeals, Guayama Judicial Region, Panel XII, Case Num. [read post]
