Search for: "Scaling v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 4,691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2011, 3:43 am
As Mr Justice Mostyn stated at paragraph 85: "The court has to strive to make the break as clean as is reasonably possible, but I emphasise the qualification. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:36 am
On 15 December 2020, the Supreme Court heard the parties’ submissions in the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited v State of Libya. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm
Who wants the state to kill him and who will (likely) get his wish. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:50 am
Matta eventually tried to scale a fence, and was captured. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
The Court considered the “Istanbul Protocol”, which guides medical experts to indicate for each lesion the degree of consistency between it and the cause given by the patient, on a scale from “not consistent” to “diagnostic of”. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:22 am
Tanita Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:11 am
See also Daniels v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:38 am
State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:25 am
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Unite Here Local 355 v Mulhall, in which the Justices are considering whether a so-called neutrality agreement between a union and employer is a thing of “value” within the meaning of Section 302 of the NLRA and thus prohibited as a felony. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:22 pm
The Intellectual Property Office of Singapore ("IPOS") deliberated this issue in Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd v Digi International Inc. [2020] SGIPOS 1.The Parties Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd (the "Opponent") is a Japanese company dealing inter alia, in electronic price-computing scales named 'DIGI'. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:16 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 2:10 am
Late Amendment Tips Scales in Favor of Defendants Last Wednesday, Judge Davis (EDTX) was asked to revisit a motion to stay an ongoing litigation between SouthWire Company v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
Tuesday morning’s argument in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:47 am
AF Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:16 pm
" In the second case, Sossamon v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 4:06 pm
While this has not been utilized by agents of the state to the best of our knowledge, it would seem that such a use of technology by police officials would ultimately fall under the same rules, at least as long as users intend data to remain private. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:12 am
8thCirc.jpg As long as a proper foundation is establish, a party may introduce photographs of tangible objects (a box of ammunition, identification cards with the defendant's name, and an electronic scale), which had been seized and destroyed before trial, instead of the objects themselves, in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 11:19 am
In MVL USA, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
