Search for: "Schneider v. Chang " Results 141 - 160 of 169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Lesson learned from a business survey’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IAM) Speakers discuss technology transfer for climate change; within academic settings (Intellectual Property Watch) The ‘dirty little secret of patents’ is that most are worthless to their owners. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
(IPKat) Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on trade marks – no change? [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:33 am
Laing, 43 AD3d 713, 715 [1st Dept 2007]; see also Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz, Damashek & Shoot, v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(Financial Aspects of Intellectual Property) IP finance seminar on patent and copyright term: ‘IP Term: What it Means in Finance Terms’ presentation (IP finance) The difference between invention and innovation in the netbook space (Techdirt) WIPO launches strategic change program (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP Kenya) Draft programme of WIPO funder meeting for development (Intellectual Property Watch) Confidential document from WIPO details strategy on IP,… [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 6:35 pm
Here is the 23-page opinion of Special Judge Diane Kavadias Schneider, in the Lake County early voting case, Curley v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
There's been a string of major decisions by the New Jersey Supreme Court that indicate that New Jersey might no longer be the plaintiffs' jurisdiction of choice.We date this sea change from the Supreme Court's decision in Thiedemann v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Most consumers agree that intellectual property law is essential to ensure that creators of inventions, ideas, designs, services and the like are rewarded for their creativity and to promote the continuation of such creations.[1] In order to grant creators with the incentive to continue creating, such creators must be equipped with the satisfaction of knowing that their creations will not be transformed into cheap imitations which will inevitably compete with their own original creations. [read post]