Search for: "Scott v. Illinois"
Results 141 - 160
of 548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2007, 11:46 am
(Scott v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:14 am
Scott A. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:14 am
At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy highlights “four big cases still on the docket. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 7:27 am
Scott E. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:08 am
For WTVO/WQRF, via Mystateline.com, Scott Pickens reports that “[a]ttorneys for the Illinois Child Support Specialist who is suing his own union, AFSCME, have filed their first brief … in a case [that] could potentially significantly change the relationship between state government and public employee unions,” Janus v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:27 am
Facts: This case (Puntillo et al v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 10:33 pm
Scott, 524 U.S. 357, 141 L. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 5:03 am
A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et al. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 4:01 pm
I promise I’m not trying to beat you over the head with Sackett v. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 8:45 am
Only last term, the Justices were divided along rules/standards lines where dog searches for drugs were concerned ( in USSC Illinois v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
IV; Illinois v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 2:20 am
Scott Oswald at The Employment Law Group. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:54 am
Supp. 2d ___, 2012 WL 5378148 (U.S.District Court for the Central District of Illinois 2012). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
First, it sued Analog Devices in Illinois for infringement of U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
First, it sued Analog Devices in Illinois for infringement of U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:02 am
An Illinois federal district court permitted plaintiff to move ahead with ten of his 13 claims.In Oakes v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
(Thanks to Sina Safvati, Daniel Simkin, and Sabine Tsuruda, the Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic students who worked on the brief.) [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 8:29 am
Scott v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
This most recent iteration of the perpetual battle between Scott Johnson and Starbucks, Scott Johnson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
I’m delighted to report that Michael Rosman and Michelle Scott of the Center for Individual Rights, Lisa Steele of AWARE (Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment), and I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of AWARE in Commonwealth v. [read post]
