Search for: "Scott v. Scott" Results 141 - 160 of 9,198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2023, 6:19 am by Unreported Opinions
The court merged the former count with the latter and sentenced Byrd to a […] The post EVAN SCOTT BYRD v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:48 am by Scott Bomboy
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Partners Jennifer Breen, Richard Zarin, Daniel Carmody, Stephen Tirrell, and Jedd Wider, with associate Scott Lee, co-authored an article for Law360 looking at the US Tax Court’s recent decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Partners Jennifer Breen, Richard Zarin, Daniel Carmody, Stephen Tirrell, and Jedd Wider, with associate Scott Lee, co-authored an article for Law360 looking at the US Tax Court’s recent decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Partners Jennifer Breen, Richard Zarin, Daniel Carmody, Stephen Tirrell, and Jedd Wider, with associate Scott Lee, co-authored an article for Law360 looking at the US Tax Court’s recent decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Partners Jennifer Breen, Richard Zarin, Daniel Carmody, Stephen Tirrell, and Jedd Wider, with associate Scott Lee, co-authored an article for Law360 looking at the US Tax Court’s recent decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Partners Jennifer Breen, Richard Zarin, Daniel Carmody, Stephen Tirrell, and Jedd Wider, with associate Scott Lee, co-authored an article for Law360 looking at the US Tax Court’s recent decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Partners Jennifer Breen, Richard Zarin, Daniel Carmody, Stephen Tirrell, and Jedd Wider, with associate Scott Lee, co-authored an article for Law360 looking at the US Tax Court’s recent decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am by Erica Canas
Secondary meaning generally requires a showing that the design: has been in substantial commercial use (as shown by marketing budgets and materials, number of sales, surveys, and the like)the source has used the design continuously and exclusively (at least 5 years), and is distinctive (relative to other similar products).Trade dress protection can be raised as a legal claim in a law suit against, for example, someone selling or manufacturing knockoff products, such as in the Jason Scott… [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]