Search for: "Scott v. United States Government et al"
Results 141 - 160
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
The case is now pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:56 am
(IP Think Tank) US Copyright – Decisions Tenenbaum found guilty of wilful copyright infringement, hit with $675,000 fine (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (Ars Technica) (Ars Technica) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The IP Factor) (Excess Copyright) (Public Knowledge) (IPKat) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amazon – Amazon hit with class action lawsuit over Kindle deletion (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (EFF) Associated Press – Rights… [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Tinker et al. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP) Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda) Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46)… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(Spicy IP) Global credit crisis leads to boom times for legal process outsourcing businesses specialising in IP (Spicy IP) Israel Israeli bakery Matzot Aviv files trade mark infringement suit against rival Patisserie Aviv and US importer Bagel Bites (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office relaxes conditions for modified examination (The IP Factor) Italy Italian Supreme Court recognises ‘post sale confusion’ in criminal proceedings concerning sales of… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
: CoStar v Dumann (Techdirt) Gatehouse Media - Gatehouse Media sues New York Times over republication of news headlines (Out-Law) (IP Watchdog) MPAA - MPAA also likes idea of ISP enforcers for file sharing (Techdirt) Nine Inch Nails - CC-licensed NIN album Amazon’s best-selling MP3 album for 2008 (Creative Commons) (Lessig) (Techdirt) (ReadWriteWeb) (Michael Geist) Nine Inch Nails - Reznor releases footage of Nine Inch Nails’ current tour on BitTorrent (Copyfight)… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
MCNEIL, et al. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
: (Spicy IP), India: DCGI preparing document to implement patent-registration linkage: (Spicy IP), New Zealand: Generic pharmaceutical companies taking advantage of NZ IP laws and medicines regulations: (International Law Office), Uganda: Cipla licenses ARV technology into Uganda: (Afro-IP), US: Money saved through generic prescriptions: (GenericsWeb), US: Government plans to keep close tab on drug patent settlements: (GenericsWeb), US: FTC reports 14 deals to delay generics in 2007:… [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:53 am
And there are those who think John Yoo, et al., might actually be tried in such a court. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
To take the best-known precedent, after World War II the United States prosecuted German government lawyers in the second round of Nuremberg trials. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:22 pm
As a matter of full disclosure, Joondeph also served as a consultant for the State and Local Legal Center in the preparation of its amicus brief for the Government Finance Officers of America et al. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Reynolds, et al. -- immunity of wholesale discount prices to challenge under Robinson-Patman Act solely because they are available to all buyers. 06-1617, Gilles v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM Defendant's conviction and sentence. 07a0257p.06 2007/07/10 Brown, et al v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
A Lot of Reporters Must Be Calling Al Qaeda (May 15, 2006)101. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Nothing in this Act shall apply to any of the following:(1) Actions or transactions specifically authorized by laws administered by any regulatory body or officer acting under statutory authority of this State or the United States.815 Ill. [read post]
