Search for: "Security T. & S. Bank v. Superior Court"
Results 141 - 154
of 154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2008, 6:03 am
The origin of the “zone of insolvency” issue can be traced to the decision in Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland, N.V. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
The question before the court was an interesting one: whether an investment adviser, which allocates funds for its clients, could bring suit on their behalf even though it didn't own the underlying securities. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:58 am
Gene &;amp; Gene LLC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 8:08 pm
On September 12, 2008, Integrity shareholders filed a purported class action in Georgia (Fulton County) Superior Court against the holding company and four Integrity officers. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 5:30 pm
SageCrest II LLC, 08-50075, Superior Court, Stamford, Connecticut. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:54 pm
Bellia, Paul Schiff Berman &;amp; David G. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 12:54 am
Court Panel Throws Out Verdict Against Stock Exchange The Legal Intelligencer The Philadelphia Stock Exchange cannot be held liable for injuries a former trader sustained in an incident with a competitor on PHLX's trading floor because the plaintiff's case is pre-empted by federal securities law, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 12:59 am
Enron Investors Banking on High Court The Associated Press The hopes of Enron investors are riding on Stoneridge v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:42 am
With respect to commonality, the federal court observed that “[t]his requirement is usually met where a class's claims arise out of some form of standardized conduct by the defendant. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 12:41 pm
Such a decision was the Eighth Circuit's ruling in Watson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:16 pm
Fireside Bank v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:08 am
In this regard, the district court’s conclusion as to what constitutes a “deceptive act” was &;#8220;integral” to its class certification ruling, bearing directly on the predominance and superiority tests under Rule 23(b)(3). [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
Crisp, 211 Ga. 636, 641 (1955); Brunswick & Western Railroad Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2004, 11:36 pm
Many divisions of the Los Angeles Superior Court are taking several months to schedule Superior Court appeals. [read post]
