Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 141 - 160
of 6,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
In the recent case of Sellers v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 7:34 am
By permitting the buyer to agree to a seller's higher asking price but obtaining assurance that the value promised by the seller... [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:58 pm
Judgment was given today in Case C-41/14Christie's France SNC v Syndicat national des antiquaires, a reference from the French Cour de Cassation for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 2:48 pm
" The case is Manula, et al v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:49 pm
Dedon GmbH v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 7:00 am
In Pastor v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 3:18 am
Roberts v Saffell, ___ Mich App ___ (2008) (Lawyers Weekly No. 07-67463 - 12 pages) (published opinion) (Markey, J., joined by Wilder, J.) [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:45 pm
Sellers, J. [read post]
22 Sep 2006, 1:26 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
See also the leading Supreme Court Case on this issue: ABB Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
For example, in the 2015 case Harris v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:55 pm
Raven Resources, LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 11:04 am
The petitioner now appeals the First Circuit’s affirmance given that the jury did not find a “device, scheme, or artifice to defraud” (Lemelson v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
Accord Wheat v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:06 am
Students should note that if the contract specifically disclaims reliance on any representations as to the physical condition of the building, there is no claim arising from the seller’s alleged misrepresentations that the building did not have a bedbug problem. 85-87 Pitt St., LLC v. 85-87 Pitt St. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
CRE Niagara Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
Qlarant, Inc. v. [read post]
