Search for: "Sentell v State"
Results 141 - 160
of 187
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm
The other element in U.S v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm
Further proof that the death of Crawford has been greatly exaggerated comes in the form of a recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm
Judge David Sentelle added, “You can’t regulate washing machines. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 1:49 pm
" Judge Sentelle was referring to the 1983 case U.S. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm
UPDATE: I have now posted the opinions, and here’s a quick run-down: (a) Judge Sentelle’s dissent argues that GPS surveillance is directly covered by the Supreme Court’s beeper case, United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
In support, the government cites the plurality’s statement in Hamdi v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:33 am
I posted earlier a summary by Larkin Reynolds of the coming argument in Salahi v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:07 pm
Circuit this fall is Salahi v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
Judge Griffith wrote the opinion for the court in El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
(j) United States v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 2:19 pm
Circuit decision in al Maqaleh v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 8:32 am
Sentelle, David S. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:40 am
V. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:09 am
Circuit has handed down its opinion in Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:55 am
Circuit handed down its opinion in Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:38 am
., v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
State court certified copies of computer printouts of entries reflecting the defendant’s prior criminal convictions was presumptively reliable under FRE 803(8); the mere possibility of error in the computer records was insufficient to challenge their reliability, in United States v. [read post]
