Search for: "Shelley v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2012, 7:49 am by Carlton Larson
  First, Vinson had authored unanimous opinions for the Court in the most important race cases he confronted: Shelley v Kraemer, invalidating judicial enforcement of racially restrictive real estate covenants; Sweatt v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:22 pm by Lawrence Solum
Explanations for why federal courts sometimes treat the private actions of private parties as public actions subject to the Constitution, like the Supreme Court did in Shelley v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:36 am by Tony Mauro
Board of Education, but some of the cases were on the issues I just raised employment cases, criminal justice cases, housing cases like Shelley v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:32 am by Lyle Denniston
  But the core issue raised by state officials in their stay application (Tennant, et al., v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
Shelley Moore Capito and David McKinley — against each other in the GOP primary. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:22 pm by David R. Papke
Fortunately, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Shelley v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 2:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) That’s what seems to be the holding of Gilbert v. 7355 South Shore Condominium Ass’n & Shelley Norton (Chi. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Dudziak, University of Southern California,Susan Carle, American University, “Late Nineteenth Century Civil Rights Organizations and their role in the Founding of the NAACP and the National Urban League”Jeffrey Gonda, Yale University, “The Business of Civil Rights: Black Realtors and Shelley v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
 In a decision widely considered the high-water mark of state-action doctrine, Shelley v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 7:15 am by Dan Tokaji
Shelley, 324 F.Supp.2d 1120 (2004). [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:32 pm by admin
Shelley J. rejected these arguments, stating that: “I also cannot accept the argument that she was in such an unequal position of power and was so vulnerable that she was forced to enter into a contract of minimal benefit to her”. [read post]