Search for: "Shepard v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2016, 2:41 pm
Based on Taylor, which involved several Missouri burglary statutes, and the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Shepard v. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 1:51 pm
Shepard. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:14 am
" The article discusses why enhancements based on prior drug convictions are not really sound public policy (providing ammunition for convincing the court to disregard certain enhancements under the USSG), but it also provides details on how attorneys in the District of Connecticut have used Shepard v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 6:47 pm
"As the Supreme Court held in the 1993 Wisconsin v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 7:45 am
US v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:31 pm
United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) and Shepard v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 3:31 pm
See Screws v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:36 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 4:50 pm
She argues that under "Shepard v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 2:29 pm
United States and Shepard v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:47 am
Bradley v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:16 pm
Charles Coble at the Newsroom Law Blog comments on the United States Supreme Court's decision to deny certiorari in Salzano v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:42 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 2:17 pm
First in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 11:31 am
To be sure, Justice Scalia in his majority opinion in Montejo stated on page 21 of the slip opinion “Michigan v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 3:45 am
Patrick Guinane of the NWI Tmes writes today on yesterday's 3-2 ruling by the Indiana Supreme Court in the case of Porter County Sheriff Department v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 2:34 pm
When United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 8:33 pm
Willie Eaton v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Haupt, Professional Speech (October 13, 2014).Georgina Yeomans, The Constitutionality of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 in Light of Shelby County v. [read post]