Search for: "Shepherd v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 398
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
The following judgments are to be handed down in the Supreme Court on Wednesday 25 May 2011: FA (Iraq) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23 – 24 February 2011 (our case preview is here) Shepherd Masimba Kambadzi (also known as SK (Zimbabwe)) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 – 11 February 2011 Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate, heard 21 – 22 March 2011 (here is our case… [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:39 am
"From Friday's Hernandez v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
Div. 1982), rev’d on other grounds, State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 3:25 pm
Shepherd v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 2:15 pm
Vaile v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 4:14 pm
” Related Web Resources: NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm
” Shepherd v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm
It is also a stringent exposition of the requirements of informed consent – and one which would find favour with GDPR proponents and those Parliamentarians shepherding the new Data Protection Bill through Parliament. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:05 pm
Ass'n v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 1:36 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 12:30 am
” Saucier v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:29 am
Gotta love state court.Geico v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:00 am
Fish & Fish Ltd v Sea Shepherd UK, 8 December 2014. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 8:22 am
[v] U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:38 am
Trenton State Coll., 162 N.J. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:16 am
See FDA v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:35 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:48 am
In Kelo v. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 9:19 pm
In Kokesh v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:10 am
" The entry ends with this quote from an editorial in the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette:The disagreement is the latest that shows how important it is for legislators and their legal advisers to scrutinize the precise language of the bills they author and shepherd through the legislative process.The entry concluded with this observation from the ILB:This brings to mind a recent Supreme Court ruling (see ILB entry here from June 23rd), Utility Center, Inc., d/b/a Aquasource v. [read post]
