Search for: "Sheridan v Sheridan" Results 141 - 160 of 404
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Coulson is  on trial at the High Court in Edinburgh, accused of lying under oath in the 2010 trial of Tommy Sheridan. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Coulson is accused of lying in the 2010 perjury trial of the Scottish politician Tommy Sheridan, falsely stating that before the arrest of private investigator Glenn Mulcaire and News of the World journalist Clive Goodman, he did not know that Goodman was involved in phone-hacking. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:57 am by Legal Beagle
Sheridan was later convicted of perjury and sentenced to three years in prison.Mr Coulson denies all of the charges against himScotland's Judicial Office initially said: "The trial diet in the case of HM Advocate v Andrew Coulson, previously set for Monday 11 May 2015, has been adjourned. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 8:34 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Probate Law Opinions Body: SC19257 - McConnell v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:04 am by assoulineberlowe
The Pirker case was the first challenge to the FAA’s attempt to regulate small unmanned aerial vehicles [UAVs] under existing policies (Administrator v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Sheridan, J.) granted defendants' motion to dismiss under Fed. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:19 am by Patricia Salkin
Tarver v City of Sheridan Board of Adjustment, 2014 WL 2535251 (WY 6/5/2014) The decision can be accessed at: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Documents/Opinions/2014WY71.pdfFiled under: Current Caselaw, Res Judicata [read post]
25 May 2014, 4:04 am by J
It is not possible or desirable to provide any sort of exhaustive list, but the following examples illustrate the breadth of the concept: (1)            A procedural irregularity or manifest unfairness which causes the decision of a Tribunal to be unjust. (2)            A decision based on a finding of fact for which there is no supporting evidence (British Telecom v… [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Manhattan Child Custody Lawyer said that pursuant to a court order or a stipulation of settlement, a parent may be directed as part of his or her basic child support obligation to contribute to a child's college educational expenses based on Domestic Relations Law § 240[1-b] [c] [7] and as held in the cases of Comstock v Comstock, Jablonski v Jablonski and Sheridan v Sperber. [read post]