Search for: "Silver v. Downs" Results 141 - 160 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC will hand down judgment in the case of Kozbar v Telegraph Media Group. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
As we enter the courtroom for today’s argument in Christie v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 1 December 2017, Langstaff J handed down judgment in the case of Various Claimants v W M Morrisons Supermarket plc [2017] EWHC 3113 (QB). [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
On 22 November 2017, Warby J handed down in judgment in the case of Candy v Holyoake (No.2) [2017] EWHC 2943 (QB). [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On 17 November 2017 Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Alsaifi v Trinity Mirror plc [2017] EWHC 2873. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 9 November 2017 HHJ Moloney QC handed down judgment in the case of David v Hosany, heard 20, 21 and 24 July 2017. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand The Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Hagaman v Little ([2017] NZCA 447). [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 7:13 am by John Jascob
The panel’s sometime reluctance to delve into the technology’s implications for the securities markets frustrated committee member Damon Silvers (AFL-CIO), who tried to pin panelists down as to whether the purchase of cryptocurrency is a contract and, if so, who is answerable if anything goes wrong. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Only 4 cited © cases: Mazer v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 10:24 am by Eric Goldman
. * Techdirt: Feds Say Jewelry Company CEO Scrubbed Google Results With Fake Court Orders And Forged Judge’s Signatures * In IMDb v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Matt Barnum considers whether Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 12:52 pm by David Duncan
  In that decision, the Second Circuit dismissed Silver’s arguments that the evidence was insufficient for conviction, but agreed that the instructions to the jury as to what constituted an “official act” taken in return for or in anticipation of being paid a bribe or kickback, were too broad in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in McDonnell v. [read post]