Search for: "Simmons v. Ins*"
Results 141 - 160
of 714
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
The defendant "must simply be aware that his conduct is likely to result in harm to a child, whether directed at the child or not" (id. at 371-372, citing PL 15.05[2]; see also People v Simmons, 92 NY2d 829, 830 [1998]). [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 10:15 pm
Helen V. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
Chapter v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:01 am
Steve Baldwin of A&O and Philipp Widera of Simmons & Simmons gave an overview of case law on SPCs in the UK and Germany resulting from recent CJEU references. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 3:21 pm
" Simmons at 9114, citing State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 6:16 am
Simmons, 2011 U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 3:04 am
For practitioners the message was that whilst there may be a grace period for adjustments post-Brexit, it may be wiser to take action now in order to avoid issues such as being unable to service clients, and the rush to meet EUIPO guides that will likely incur high costs.The Keynote: Key Trade Mark Cases of the Last 12 monthsBenet Brandreth QC (11 South Square) gave an enthusiastic review of some of the most interesting Trade Mark cases in the last 12 months; such as Cartier v B Sky B;… [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:32 pm
| Justice Slade delivers judgement in Arthur J Gallagher Services v Skriptchenko [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 8:13 am
In Simmons v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
Ashcroft and Golan v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
The IPKat's Eleonora Rosati is joining forces with Simmons&Simmons to organise a panel discussion devoted to analysing the judgment, as well as its significance for both EU copyright law and the policy discussion currently unfolding in Brussels.Re-using Amazon item numbers (ASINs) for similar goods can constitute trade mark infringement and passing offGuestKat Rosie Burbidge (probably a fan of the big bang theory) analyzes the recent IPEC case, Jadebray & Noa and Nani… [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:26 pm
Simmons. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:31 am
The panel cites Simmons v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 10:44 am
David Simmons, R-Altamonte Springs. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 4:44 am
The trial court ruled for Rosetta, holding that the Simmons well did not trigger a contractual duty to protect against drainage because the Simmons well was not on acreage adjoining the Martin lease. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
Henry v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 11:26 am
Renault may not have intervened in all Nokia v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
In these cases—Elrod v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:18 am
North Carolina and denied review in Simmons v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:11 pm
Simmons (2005) and Graham v. [read post]
