Search for: "Simmons v. Ins*"
Results 141 - 160
of 714
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2019, 7:30 am
Then much hemming and hawing ensued with citations to Dixie Dairies Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
”Over to guest Kat, Amy Crouch (Simmons & Simmons) who reports on the session:"The SPC panel was moderated by Oliver Jan Jüngst (Bird & Bird LLP, Düsseldorf) and first to take the stage was Marleen van den Horst (BarentsKrans, The Hague) who presented on SPC Reform in the EU. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 8:20 am
There are real difficulties with claim drafting for broad and limited claims:This was dealt with in the Amgen v Sanofi (PCSK 9 antibody) cases. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
Kat friend and Fordham guest Kat, Amy Crouch (Simmons & Simmons) reports on the session.Over to Amy: "Klaus Grabinski (Federal Court of Justice, Karlsruhe) started the discussion by outlining infringement of second medical use patents in German case law. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:26 am
But petitioners in Allen v Cooper are hoping the Supreme Court changes that. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Hot on the heels of last month’s 2019 edition of the Retromark conference, reviewed here, comes the fifth (how times flies) edition of Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons’ Retromark rundown of notable trade mark cases over the past six months. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
Katfriend and Simmons & Simmons trainee Ayomide Sanwo has prepared a report on the day. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
See Simmons v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 7:19 am
If you have signed up and are unable to attend, please let Eleonora know through Eventbrite here.Get Ready for Retromark: the conference - Our Retromark event, brought to you by The IPKat and Katfriend Darren Meale is officially fully booked for Wednesday 27 March starting at 2pm at Simmons & Simmons’ London office in Moorgate. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 10:23 am
The case is State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 7:25 am
Simmons & Others, 169 Ariz. 229, 237, 818 P.2d 214, 222 (Ariz.App. 1991)). [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 7:25 am
Simmons & Others, 169 Ariz. 229, 237, 818 P.2d 214, 222 (Ariz.App. 1991)). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
As the debate continues as to whether the UK courts have taken command of global FRAND determinations or whether it is all storm in a teacup, Michael Burdon (Simmons & Simmons) has some critical analysis to share as to the role of the English courts in FRAND determinations in the absence of a dispute resolution mechanisms in SSOs and what that means moving forward. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 6:51 am
Referring to the “sensible, fair and practicable dividing line” that was laid down in the case of Allied Maples Group Ltd v Simmons & Simmons (a firm) [1995] 1 WLR 1602, the court noted that: “… the courts have developed a clear and common-sense dividing line between those matters which the client must prove, and those which may better be assessed upon the basis of the evaluation of a lost chance. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 6:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 am
The AmeriKat, unfortunately, has yet to attend an EPLAW Congress, coming, as they often do, during an intensely busy court term. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:22 am
Simmons, A Will for Willa Cather, 83 MO. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 3:04 am
For practitioners the message was that whilst there may be a grace period for adjustments post-Brexit, it may be wiser to take action now in order to avoid issues such as being unable to service clients, and the rush to meet EUIPO guides that will likely incur high costs.The Keynote: Key Trade Mark Cases of the Last 12 monthsBenet Brandreth QC (11 South Square) gave an enthusiastic review of some of the most interesting Trade Mark cases in the last 12 months; such as Cartier v B Sky B;… [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:23 pm
., v. [read post]
