Search for: "Singh v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am
R (on the application of HA (Nigeria)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 979 (Admin) – Read judgment The detention of a mentally ill person in an Immigration Removal Centre (IRC) amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment and false imprisonment, and was irrational, the High Court has ruled. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:12 am
Notably, the Court of Appeal stated that subsequent case law, including Sage v Secretary of State for the Environment [2003] UKHL 22, has placed greater emphasis on the need to view planning permissions as a whole rather than as consent for delineable acts of development. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm
Anam v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1140 – Read judgment This appeal raises interesting questions about the approach the courts should take when considering whether detention pending deportation is legal in a case involving an ex-convict with serious psychiatric illness. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:41 pm
It may be accepted under certain circumstances [See State of Haryana v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 10:30 pm
A secular judge must be wary of straying across the well-recognised divide between church and state. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:27 am
In the recent South African Supreme Court case of Scholtz & others v The State 2018, ZASCA, the court noted that in determining the existence of corruption, the view is that “corruption is all too often an issue which has to be determined by way of inference drawn from the proven facts. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
" In Surjit Singh, M.D. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 7:14 am
R.Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Mandeep Singh Chehil was arrested after a police sniffer dog found a large quantity of cocaine in his suitcase at the Halifax airport. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am
In such cases the court is not discussing the truth or reasonableness of any of the doctrines of the religious association, but as stated by Lord Davey in General Assembly of the Free Church of Scotland v Overtoun [1904] AC 515 (1904 7 F (HL) 1): “The more humble, but not useless, function of the civil Court is to determine whether the trusts imposed upon property by the founders of the trust are being duly observed. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
Further he found that provided the SSHD applied the Hardial Singh principals, where a reasonableness test is applied to detention, then there was no need for specific custody time limits. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:31 am
Italy): On Right Outcomes and Wrong Terms Marco Calisto, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State: Germany v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm
” – Justice Scalia in Holland v Illinois. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
Coverage continues of the Court’s decisions in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 3:26 pm
And asked if the Chairman of the Copyright Board, Dr Raghbir Singh was sufficiently qualified to merit his post. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:30 am
Tomorrow, (May 19) an interesting SLP is coming up as a fresh matter before the Vacation Bench of Justice C.K.Thakker and Lokeshwar Singh Panta in the matter of Union of India v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am
He further submitted that in the case of Mohinder Singh v. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 5:18 am
United States, 730 F.2d 1465 (Fed. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:02 am
State of Ohio v. [read post]
