Search for: "Smith v. District of Columbia" Results 141 - 160 of 422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 8:17 am by admin
” “This decision and its predecessor — the District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Wednesday, during oral arguments in Blassingame v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 7:36 am by Joseph Blocher and Eric Ruben
The methodological debate animating this case began 10 years ago in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:14 am by Mike Scarcella
District Court for the District of Columbia not to approve $60.8 million. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:28 am by Steve Hall
District Court for the District of Columbia blocked importation of foreign-made sodium thiopental into the United States. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:39 am by Suzanne Ito
Reproductive Rights: The House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution will hold a hearing on the District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 3803), which would ban abortions after 20 weeks in the District of Columbia. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
 The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed Jones's conviction `because of admission of the evidence obtained by warrantless use of the GPS device. . . . [read post]
EEOC, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia held that the EEOC had failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its 30 percent incentive limit, and as a result, the EEOC removed the incentive sections from the ADA and GINA regulations. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit delicately put it – “property owned by the United States government. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am by Mark Rienzi
The court could also revisit or narrow Smith in Fulton v. [read post]