Search for: "Smith v. State Bar (1989)" Results 141 - 160 of 162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
That testimony killed the plaintiff's standard product liability case, because under California (and almost all other states') law, a plaintiff cannot establish causation in an inadequate warning case where the prescribing physician did not rely upon the allegedly defective warning. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 3:48 pm
State, 840 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 2002)................. iii Smith v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Stoner Issue: Whether, under the False Claims Act, state officials are “persons” who can be sued in their individual capacity for actions taken in their official capacity, and whether the Eleventh Amendment bars such suits by qui tam relators if the United States declines to intervene. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Carl Gaeth was employed as a sales manager at Oracle Corp. from 1986 until 1989. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
Raymark Industries, Inc., 561 A.2d 257 (N.J. 1989), Ayers v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
State, 545 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 1989)...................................................................................................8 Tafero v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
State, 545 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 1989)...................................................................................................8 Tafero v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Schneider, 555 A.2d 1112, 1118-19 (N.J. 1989); Ellis v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:03 am
Kentucky barring race-bases used of peremptory challenges in criminal trials. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
App. 1975) (a "state can never sue in tort in its political or governmental capacity"), aff'd, 356 N.E.2d 561 (Ill. 1976).Chicago v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Hess, 536 N.E.2d 1126, 1135 (N.Y. 1989); Nelson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]