Search for: "Smith v. The U.S. Department of Justice"
Results 141 - 160
of 736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm
The Justice Department urged the Court to hear the case to resolve a conflict on the issue among federal appeals courts. ** In Gonzalez v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
The Department of Justice would be free to argue for changes in the law. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:02 pm
Smith and Robert G. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 12:20 pm
In Tanzin v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:31 am
In U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
” North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:01 pm
U.S. (1967) and Smith v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:14 am
Bash, a supporting lawyer from the Justice Department. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 9:53 pm
SMITH, JR. and MICHAEL J. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:09 am
Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 11:34 am
Smith was appointed by President George W. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:59 am
NO CLAIM TO ORIGINAL U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
” At The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Marcia Coyle reports that “[t]he Trump administration’s Justice Department, despite its announced regret, is asking the U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 883–85 (1990), and re-establish the “balancing” test established by Sherbert v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
Miller and Smith v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
After Chutkan denied that request in December, it was Smith who came to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to weigh in on Trump’s claim to immunity without waiting for the U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
”[5][6] Justice Thomas’s plurality opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
