Search for: "Smith v. U.S. Government (Department of Justice)" Results 141 - 160 of 598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2022, 11:36 am by Phil Dixon
After trial, the defendant sought additional information about the case, and the government provided information that should have been disclosed to the defendant before trial under Department of Justice policies. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:30 am by Sherry F. Colb
Smith, which demands only that government not discriminate against religious practice or religion, remains the law. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
"[1] "Public access to civil trials … provides information leading to a better understanding of the operation of government as well as confidence in and respect for our judicial system. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am by John Elwood
Smith and Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:43 am by Andrew Hamm
Smith 21-475Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm by Andrew Hamm
In her petition, Smith asks the justices to review these holdings and potentially, if the law is generally applicable, to revisit the prevailing standard from Employment Division v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 9:03 am by Lee Kovarsky
President Donald Trump’s Justice Department decided to get the federal government back in the execution business, and it began announcing execution dates during the summer of 2019. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 9:18 am by Eugene Volokh
They're [sic] on air U.S. politics reporter is paid by the Russian government to produce propaganda for that government. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 5:01 am by Lindsay F. Wiley, Steve Vladeck
And although there has been significant clamor among conservatives to overrule Smith (including three justices expressly endorsing such a move in June’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]