Search for: "Snowden v. Snowden"
Results 141 - 160
of 636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 11:34 am
Note that the government had sought to preclude the court from allowing Zaidan to support his claim with reference to classified material leaked by Edward Snowden, which certainly would have caused his complaint to fail. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 6:30 am
In Snowden v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 5:24 am
Rick Ledgett reminded us of the many dedicated NSA staffers on the five-year anniversary of the Snowden disclosures. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
Apparently authorities were concerned that its color indicated gang affiliation.In Snowden v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
In Schrems v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am
On March 7, the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee voted 10-to-one to approve legislation authorizing the operations of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for the first time since the Department’s inception on March 1, 2003. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 3:01 pm
Interestingly, though, Nitze clerked for Justice Sotomayor during the 2012 Supreme Court term, when the court decided U.S. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:35 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument Tuesday morning in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 10:36 am
That indictment occurred at an awkward time for the Obama administration, in the midst of the aftermath of the Snowden revelations. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
A lot of this work was not possible in previous times, as it is based on new forms of data being made available to researchers and insights gleaned from analyzing public leaks and disclosures concerning surveillance like the Snowden revelations. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 7:39 am
On one level, United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
The issue of law enforcement access to data held abroad is in the news again with the Supreme Court set to hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
Four Thoughts on the Briefing in Carpenter v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
In the United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 7:25 am
Due to the CDPA not defining what a dramatic work is, Snowden J applied Nourse LJ’s definition of a dramatic work (Norowzian v Arks Limited (No 2) [2000] EMLR 67 p 73). [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:00 am
" The original version of this case, known as Klayman v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
In particular, 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the UK has gained particular attention [Guardian report] as... [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 2:10 am
Justice Snowden swiftly dismissed this argument, as Mr Banner never had any customers in the UK who purchased the rights to the TV show. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
Last time the CJEU reviewed US privacy law, in Schrems v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 5:01 am
Trump, ACLU v. [read post]
