Search for: "South Carolina v. Johnson"
Results 141 - 160
of 252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
Kenneth Vanko answers both questions in his recent post on the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in Milliken & Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
§924(c)(3)(B), is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
Johnson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 7:09 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 8:41 am
Anders Walker explores how three moderate Southern governors formulated masked resistance in the wake of Brown v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
Moreover, once Goldberg replaced Frankfurter and White replaced Whittaker in 1962, there was a six person liberal majority for civil rights legislation (I should note, however, that one of the six, Hugo Black, dissented in South Carolina v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller, Scott) Modified to add filers on 11/29/2017 (znmw). [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller, Scott) Modified to add filers on 11/29/2017 (znmw). [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:06 am
The Holzer/Gabbard book does make reference to Stanton and his order to Rufus Saxton to raise black troops in South Carolina. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
Tyco Healthcare Group (IPBiz) (Patently-O) (GRAY on Claims) CAFC: prosecution history estoppel: Marctec v Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corporation (IPBiz) CAFC: Divorce and patents: Enovsys v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
South Carolina, 13-8427, the last holdover from OT2013, fell victim to a R.O.U.S. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am
Tucker, Secretary, 11-7185, yet another habeas case involving a collateral attack on the circumstances of the petitioner’s trial and the South Carolina district court’s conclusion that it lacks in personam jurisdiction over the Secretary of Florida’s Department of Corrections; the Court called for the record on April 16, but it still hasn’t arrived. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
That dilemma was eased in 2001 by another case out of North Carolina, Easley v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Bean v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 9:02 am
South Carolina’s appellate courts have waded into this issue once, in the case of Middleton v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:01 am
Newest Charges Related to Alleged COVID-19 Fraud United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
In Curling v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
” And, in the wake of the Charleston church shootings that occurred a day before Walker was handed down, there have been calls made and steps taken by (Republican as well as Democrat) elected leaders to remove the Confederate battle symbol from statehouses in places like Alabama and South Carolina. [read post]
