Search for: "Springer v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
While Microsoft has stated it’s extending this offer on the basis few claims are likely to succeed,[21] it also indicates that Microsoft believes there will be some claims that survive to settlement or even to judgment, and for which it would be optimal for Microsoft to control the litigation (rather than its customer). [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:45 am by Unknown
Migrant Hierarchies in Populist Radical-Right Rhetoric in Estonia," Chapter in Anxieties of Migration and Integration in Turbulent Times (Springer, 2023) [open access]- Authors (2) = EstoniaRelated post:- Round-up: OA Articles Published by Authors in the "Global East" (25 Jan. 2023) [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:58 am by INFORRM
It tried a similar approach in Canada in what is by now quite a well-known case, Google v Equustek. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) It is in this context that the cases of Austin v UK and Von Hannover (No 2) are considered, in order to argue that certain of the proposals currently being put forward are echoed in dominant themes within the judgments. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
I'm in Cincinnati: River City, Queen City--and even Clean City, which it gets either from being home to favorite son P&G, or from a tongue-in-cheek guilty hangover from the Simon Leis v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 7:26 am
The IPKat has learned, via the UK Intellectual Property Office, of Case C-145/10 Eva-Maria Paine v Standard Verlags GmbH, Axel Springer AG, Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH, Spiegel-Verlag Rudolf Augstein GmbH & Co KG and Verlag M. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Inforrm ran several pieces: Case Law: Von Hannover v Germany (No.2) – Unclear clarification and unappreciated margins – Kirsten Sjøvoll Case Law: Axel Springer v Germany, Grand Chamber finds violation of Article 10 – Sara Mansoori News: Axel Springer and Von Hannover – Victory for the Media in the Grand Chamber As reported by the UK Human Rights Blog, the ECHR has rejected an application by Times Newspapers for its conviction for… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:20 am
The first case (Axel Springer v Germany (App No 39954/08)) concerned media reports about a famous German TV personality who had been arrested for allegedly having used cocaine. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am by Justin Walsh
Blake State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 1 – Corinne Tobeck State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 2 – Uncontested State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 1 – Mary Helen Roberts State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 2 – Marko Liias State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 1 – Steve Robinson State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 2 – Sam Hunt / Chris Reykdal State Representative Dist. 23, Pos. 1 – Sherry… [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:14 am by New Books Script
J 301 M323 [V. 2] A breviate of parliamentary papers, 1917-1939 / P. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:18 am by INFORRM
The second case has been taken to Strasbourg by Germany’s Axel Springer publishing group, which publishes Bild newspaper. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Kenneth Parker J will hear applications in the case of Decoulos v Axel Springer Schweiz AG and Andrews J will ha [read post]