Search for: "Stanford v. The State Bar of California"
Results 141 - 160
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2009, 11:22 pm
PALO ALTO, California - To jailbreak or not to jailbreak the iPhone. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Ruehle out of evidence and also referred the law firm to the California state bar for disciplinary action. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
These adverse developments have generated a wave of private securities litigation, as well as regulatory inquiries by federal and state authorities. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(IPKat) (IPKat) IPO launches ‘Supply Chain Toolkit’ best practice toolkit for avoiding fake goods entering business supply chains (IPKat) Welsh patent applications: the results are in (IPKat) United States US General Government blocks release of documents on secret IP enforcement treaty, ACTA (EFF) Potential names for Obama IP team swirl; WTO IP Chief ‘imminent’ (Intellectual Property Watch) John W Thompson leading candidate for Commerce… [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 12:40 pm
Mirzayance (07-1315), Stanford student Ruthie Zemel prepared this preview. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:28 am
Univ. (9th Cir. 1987) 817 F.2d 499, in which the Ninth Circuit stated that some California state courts have excepted application of section 16600 “where one is barred from pursuing only a small or limited part of the business, trade or profession” (citing Boughton v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 7:00 pm
Below, Stanford student Micah Block discusses Thursday’s decision in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
On appeal, his appointed counsel filed a brief, pursuant to Anders v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 10:43 am
In the Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
John DonohueIn my view, Justice Scalia blundered badly last week in his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
Cox, alluding to the AFSCME v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:35 am
The case is Olson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE: The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
Hence, Google relies on Kelly v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
District Court in California issued an injunction against Google and Amazon.com (which operates the A9 search engine), barring them from including thumbnails of photographs from the magazine and Web site Perfect 10 in their image search results.On Wednesday, the U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Murphy v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
