Search for: "State, Dept. of Public Safety v. Held" Results 141 - 155 of 155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corp., 52 AD3d 710 (2d Dept 2008), involve outside creditors not affiliated with the corporation. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:39 am
 A2732 Townsend (MS) -- Grants sworn police officers licenses to carry and possess firearms immediately upon retirement Same as S 7639 BLURB : Pen L. retired police lic weapon Last Act: 06/12/08 held for consideration in codesA11294 O'Mara -- Relates to waivers of jury trials No Same as BLURB : CP L. waivers of jury trials Last Act: 06/12/08 held for consideration in codes Last Action Date: 06/16/08(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 3:29 pm by Giles Peaker
As Southwark's own internal communications set out in the Matthews Report reveal, the Housing dept did not think he was bringing a claim on his belongings but for re-entry. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:41 am by Patrick W. Krechowski, Esq.
  The petitioner bears the burden of ensuring the complete record is filed with the petition, including transcripts of any proceedings held below and all evidence that was presented. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 11:48 am
Hunt, 13 A.D.3d 1041, 1042 (3rd Dept. 2004). [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
The book is really a manual ... a guide to disability leave entitlement for New York Public Employees involved in law enforcement and fire fighting. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Shusta, the court stated that even participants in an informal “kick the can” game owed no additional duty to each other than to refrain from intentional or willful and wanton misconduct. [19]             Some courts have broadened the scope of liability for sports participants by imposing a duty of care for unforeseeable risks which players would clearly not endorse… [read post]