Search for: "State ex rel. Doe v. Register" Results 141 - 160 of 175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2010, 6:18 am by Isabel McArdle
A and B undertook a form of marriage ceremony anyway which was not formally registered. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:03 am
The first of these courts is famous for setting the pulse racing; in the latter court, the pulse is scarcely detectable.The duel in question was Case C-51/09 P Barbara Becker v Harman International Industries, Inc., Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, an appeal to the Fourth Chamber of the Court of Justice from the General Court.In November 2002 Barbara Becker -- former wife of well-known former tennis player Boris Becker -- applied to register as a Community trade… [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm by Stephen Page
If the applicant does not prove the case, no protection order is made.3. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am by Kurt J. Schafers
FINRA became the largest independent regulator for all securities firms doing business in the United States, and is responsible for overseeing brokerage firms, their branch offices and registered securities representatives.Under the Securities Exchange Commission’s authority FINRA promulgates rules of its own as a self regulatory organization (“SRO”). [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
Although the decision by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(Patently-O) District Court Delaware: Federal Circuit’s en banc review of written description requirement does not constitute ‘intervening change’ or alter ‘existing standards’: Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(Patently-O) District Court Delaware: Federal Circuit’s en banc review of written description requirement does not constitute ‘intervening change’ or alter ‘existing standards’: Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
No. 22599, 2008-Ohio-3859 (petition for writ of prohibition dismissed) In re: State of Ohio, ex rel., Jeremy G. [read post]