Search for: "State of CT Dept of Children " Results 141 - 160 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
MI Dept State, et al    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitMICHIGAN CLASS ACTION SUIT RE SEX OFFENDER STATUTERONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:12 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Appellate Division observed that Family Court is vested with the discretion to call witnesses, including the author of the predispositional report (see Family Ct. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Flores, 157 Misc.2d 868, 598 N.Y.S.2d 903 (Civ Ct, New York County 1993). [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
The only difference discoverable between the two cases is, that each representative of the United States will be elected by five or six thousand citizens; whilst in the individual States, the election of a representative is left to about as many hundreds. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 4:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” For example, in Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., Inc. (164 AD2d 737 [1st Dept 1991], affd 78 NY2d 572 [1991]), the Court ruled that an out-of-state judgment by confession is entitled to accelerated treatment under CPLR 3213. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:30 am
Syr fire inv bur peace off Last Act: 08/15/07 VETOED MEMO.112 S4542A KRUGER -- Relates to family offense proceedings in family and criminal court; provides concurrent jurisdiction over criminal mischief Same as A 8854-A BLURB : Fam Ct. fm offns prcd Last Act: 08/15/07 SIGNED CHAP.541 S5049 FUSCHILLO -- Relates to the definition of a vulnerable witness Same as A 4467 BLURB : CP L. vulnerable witnesses Last Act: 08/15/07 SIGNED CHAP.548 S5159 LAVALLE --… [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Connecticut – Federal Prosecutors Unseal New Indictment Accusing Former CT Lawmaker, His Wife and Business Associates of Stealing COVID Relief and Other Funds MSN – Edmund Mahoney (Hartford Courant) | Published: 2/16/2022 Federal prosecutors unsealed a new indictment against former Connecticut Rep. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:32 am
 S6920A MAZIARZ -- Prohibits level two or three sex offenders from voting at a school or facility for children Same as A 9699-A Last Act: 03/07/08 AMEND (T) AND RECOMMIT TO CODES03/07/08 PRINT NUMBER 6920AS7106 ADAMS -- Relates to sex offenses facilitated by the use of controlled substances and "date rape drugs" No Same as Last Act: 03/07/08 REFERRED TO HEALTH Last Action Date: 03/09/08(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]