Search for: "State of Cal. v. Super. Ct."
Results 141 - 160
of 400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
Lemen, 40 Cal.4th 1141, 156 P.3d 339, 343 (Cal. 2007) (permanent injunction allowed) with Willing v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 12:43 am
RG09-468037 (Cal. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:54 am
Super. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
It resulted here, in my view, in losing a motion -- in a high-value case, no less -- that should have been won.Second, more generally, even if you're a super good lawyer, know your respective lane. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 2:28 pm
Cal. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Ct. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
Super. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:47 am
Ct., 33 Cal. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 6:41 pm
Apte v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Ct., 22 Cal. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:49 am
Ct. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:05 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Super. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
Super. 2009) (so holding); Recio v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
Super. 2009) (so holding); Recio v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Super. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
Super. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:41 am
Apte v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 12:15 am
Ct. [read post]