Search for: "State of Kansas v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 1,394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 5:32 pm
Here's a link to a brief filed by Ronald Gray's counsel opposing the United States' motion to reconsider the U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
By now, the United States Supreme Court has returned many issues of great importance to the states. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 5:02 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Kansas today issued a scheduling order governing Ronald Gray's habeas litigation. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 2:40 am
Stokes, Taking Back the Fifth: Why Kansas' Approach to Inverse Condemnation Violates the United States Constitution and Leads to Unnecessary Confusion [Estate of Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 7:10 am
We have previously noted the long-running case of United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court… [read post]