Search for: "State of Missouri, Consumer Protection Division"
Results 141 - 142
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2007, 4:44 am
McKenna: Wants to challenge the historical narrative - state dilution is much older than federal protection, and state cases say the same thing decades back, though sometimes they say they're deciding based on confusion. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
This could occur, the Appellate Division held, because the defendant was a New Jersey corporation and New Jersey's "strong interest in deterrence" of consumer fraud by New Jersey businesses outweighed all other states' interests. [read post]
