Search for: "State v Cherry"
Results 141 - 160
of 734
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
Second bite at the cherry? [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:05 am
Cherry DA 19-0255 2020 MT 25 Criminal – Justice Court Appeal State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:49 am
As stated above, they have not. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 11:11 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
” Cherry v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 7:57 pm
Serving all of Southern New Jersey, the law firm has offices in Northfield, Cherry Hill, Hamilton, and Cape May Court House, NJ. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 4:05 am
Serving all of Southern New Jersey, the law firm has offices in Northfield, Cherry Hill, Hamilton, and Cape May Court House, NJ. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 6:53 pm
McCausland v Charter Township of Canton, 2019 WL 4746763 (ED MI 9/30/2019) [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 1:24 am
The head of the Workers’ Compensation Department, Frank Petro, has received the highest rating (A/V) from Martindale-Hubbell, the world’s foremost authority on law firm credentials (the A/V rating is only for lawyers considered the top in their field). [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Pascale v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Pascale v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 3:15 am
Release date Aug 13 Order a copy in advance. https:/… 2019-09-23 Publishers Say Audible's 'Captions' Defense 'Makes No Sense' – Publishers Weekly https://t.co/LwUCaFwbHF 2019-09-23 OPC concludes consultation on transfers for processing reversing proposal to treat transfers for processing as disc… https://t.co/CKTTM8UiiC 2019-09-23 UKSC rules that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful R (Miller) v Prime Minister, Cherry & Ors… [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm
The South African High Court judgment in the case of amaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services [2019] ZAGPPHC 384 is a victory for privacy rights. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Advocates of any position, however wrong-headed, can always cherry-pick some facts that they could use to buttress their arguments. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55: Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative powers. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
