Search for: "State v Seek" Results 141 - 160 of 56,674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2008, 6:47 am
Regina (Gilboy) v Liverpool City Council, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government as interested party Court of Appeal "A secure tenant, who lost that security when the tenancy was demoted on account of antisocial behaviour, failed in her challenge to the local authority landlord's internal review procedure for reconsideration of the landlord's seeking a county court order for possession. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 8:14 am
Regina (Gilboy) v Liverpool City Council, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government as interested party Court of Appeal “A secure tenant, who lost that security when the tenancy was demoted on account of antisocial behaviour, failed in her challenge to the local authority landlord's internal review procedure for reconsideration of the landlord's seeking a county court order for possession. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:02 am
In this action, California seeks damages against several major automakers on the grounds of state and federal public nuisance law.The District Court dismissed on the ground that the case raises non-justiciable political questions, with a particular focus on the third factor of Baker v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 3:12 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (Agyarko) v Secretary of State for the Home Department on 6-7 April 2016. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:09 am
Central Bedforshire Council v Housing Action Zone Ltd and others (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 613; [2009] WLR (D) 232 “In determining whether a decision by a local authority to seek possession of land where there were unauthorised occupiers was reasonable, the county court could look at a series [...] [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:13 pm
Sanderson, 715 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); State Dep’t. of Nat’l Res. v. [read post]
On February 7, 2020 the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) sued the State of Oregon in federal court seeking a declaratory judgement to invalidate a state statute that protects employees who refuse to attend lawful compulsory meetings held by employers during organizing campaigns from adverse employment action. [read post]